<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="129" />
  <endPage num="161" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000013">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Oval</name>
      <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000014">
        <heading>ADELAIDE OVAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-13">
            <name>ADELAIDE OVAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-13T14:18:00" />
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000015">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-13T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:18):  </by>I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for the City of Adelaide a question in relation to the Adelaide Oval redevelopment.</text>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000016">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000017">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY: </by> This morning on radio treasurer Foley made a number of extensive comments in relation to the redevelopment of Adelaide Oval and the wider precinct that the government is now talking about. At one point he said that we need to look at the whole area either side of the river as one precinct and ascertain how we can interface and maximise this opportunity for a great entertainment precinct for Adelaide. He went on later to say:</text>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000018">
          <inserted>The point I'm making is that we've have maintained that $450 million for the upgrade of Adelaide [Oval] but it is a larger precinct. You've got areas that are not impacting on the existing footprint of the Adelaide Oval.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000019">My question is: will the minister define the boundaries of the Adelaide Oval precinct as proposed to be managed by the controlling authority?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-05-13T14:20:00" />
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000020">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-13T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:20):  </by>I thank the honourable member for his important question. This is a government of great vision for this state. We have a number of important plans for developments and redevelopments that will put Adelaide right up there on the map. The Adelaide Oval proposal is one of many proposals: the Riverside redevelopment precinct; Victoria Square, which we spoke about yesterday; and the Thebarton urban forest. As I said, we have many plans.</text>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000021">Those developments are still under consideration and are still being worked on; the details have not been completed. The minister responsible for negotiating and working through those details is the Deputy Premier, Kevin Foley—</text>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000022">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100513dd3076f0b8014883b0000023">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Something like that, yes. Negotiations finish at about the end of July, so these matters are still being developed and are still under consideration, and they are matters the Deputy Premier and Treasurer is taking responsibility for.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>