<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-12-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4285" />
  <endPage num="4372" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Motions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Valuation</name>
      <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000963">
        <heading>LAND VALUATION</heading>
      </text>
      <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000964">Adjourned debate on motion of Hon. J.A. Darley:</text>
      <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000965">
        <inserted>That the regulations under the Valuation of Land Act 1971 concerning fees and allowances, made on 27 August 2009 and laid on the table of this council on 8 September 2009, be disallowed.</inserted>
      </text>
      <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000966">(Continued from 28 October 2009. Page 3743.)</text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2009-12-03T16:47:00" />
        <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000967">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-03T16:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (16:47):</by>  As I indicated previously, I will move to disallow these regulations as I believe that review valuers are grossly overpaid as a result of these fees, especially when consideration is given to the task they are asked to undertake.</text>
        <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000968">Prior to moving my motion for disallowance, I had been in discussion with the Valuer-General's office in an attempt to come to a compromise position on the fees in order to more adequately reflect the duties required of review valuers. At the time, we had been unable to come to a mutually agreeable position.</text>
        <page num="4345" />
        <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000969">Discussions have continued and have often been long and frustrating, especially in relation to additional fees given for complexity. Whilst I still hold concerns as to the application of these fees, the Valuer-General has assured me that these complexity fees will be applied only in exceptional circumstances and that the vast majority of reviews will attract the base fee. Therefore, I am pleased to indicate that, with the assistance of the Minister for Infrastructure and the minister's office, the Valuer-General and I have been able to come to a compromise position, which has the support of two nominating bodies: the Real Estate Institute of South Australia and the Australian Property Institute (SA Division). I therefore move:</text>
        <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000970">
          <inserted>That this order of the day be discharged.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20091203bbe88d7c503a411f80000971">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>