<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4099" />
  <endPage num="4181" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000161">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>St Clair Land Swap</name>
      <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000162">
        <heading>ST CLAIR LAND SWAP</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-01">
            <name>ST CLAIR LAND SWAP</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T14:36:00" />
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000163">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:36):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for State/Local Government Relations a question about the St Clair land swap.</text>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000164">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000165">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  It is with interest that we note that, today, the minister has backflipped on her decision and asked that that decision be set aside and has relinquished her rights to the Minister for the Southern Suburbs. My question to the minister is: will this next decision by the Minister for the Southern Suburbs be made prior to the 20 March election so that the residents of the western suburbs can be fully aware of the government's intentions prior to that election?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T14:37:00" />
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000166">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:37):</by>  I am very pleased to say that this government has acted in an extremely responsive way to community concerns; it has prioritised those concerns and issues and acted as expeditiously as it can within a responsible framework. Obviously it has considered all the matters very carefully, it has acted with a high degree of diligence and in good faith, and—</text>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000167">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="4104" />
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000168">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Just listen. Obviously, this government has also acted with advice. I announced today that I have sought to have my decision set aside. My understanding is that that will be before the Supreme Court later this week—either tomorrow or Thursday—and I understand that there are discussions taking place around that, so it is being considered. If the court does decide to set aside my decision then I have indicated that I will delegate my authority to the Hon. John Hill to conduct the decision afresh, just as the community around St Clair has requested.</text>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000169">This government has decided that it is in no-one's interest to have a protracted legal issue going on. It is important that the matter be resolved quickly so that the community can get on with its day to day business. I believe this is the best outcome for everyone, and I am very pleased to be able to deal with the matter in this way.</text>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000170">In relation to minister Hill and any process that he would undertake, or the time he would take to deal with that, that would be absolutely a matter for that minister. He would need to consider that and the matters that he believes are relevant to his decision-making. He would need to undertake that process according to all of those very important considerations. However, I have already put on the record that this issue is a priority for this government and we have given a commitment—</text>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000171">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000172">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200912017e8ce273a4984404b0000173">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  —to expedite this matter. I believe it is in the interests of the community to deal with this matter expeditiously, given the level of diligence that needs to be applied. I have already gone on the record and said that this government has prioritised this matter and that we will deal with it in an expeditious way.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>