<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-11-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3933" />
  <endPage num="4039" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Penrice Mine</name>
      <text id="2009111828b31a07551d4d6b90000412">
        <heading>PENRICE MINE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3263" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-18">
            <name>PENRICE MINE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-18T15:14:00" />
        <text id="2009111828b31a07551d4d6b90000413">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-18T15:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3263">The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH (15:14): </by> By way of a supplementary question, will the provision of legal indemnity be a characteristic of all future community consultative groups?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-18">
            <name>PENRICE MINE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-18T15:14:00" />
        <text id="2009111828b31a07551d4d6b90000414">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-18T15:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:14): </by> If you have a community group, one would expect that work undertaken by people on those groups should not involve them in any undue legal risk. I need to look at the advice. People should have legal indemnity. Where people work on government boards and have a reasonable indemnity, that should not necessarily flow through to deliberately reckless behaviour, and that is where we need the Crown Law advice to define the parameters. One would expect that anyone who is participating on these boards should not suffer from any work they undertake in a reasonable and diligent manner. The matter is fairly complicated, which is why unfortunately Crown Law has taken so long to get the advice back to the government. Clearly, we want an outcome where people should not fear undertaking work in good faith on these committees.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>