<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3815" />
  <endPage num="3861" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sands Lifestyle Village</name>
      <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000065">
        <heading>SANDS LIFESTYLE VILLAGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-29">
            <name>SANDS LIFESTYLE VILLAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000066">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:30): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Consumer Affairs a question about liquor licensing and retirement villages.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000067">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000068">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE: </by> The Sands Lifestyle Village, which is a secure community of 280 people at Seaford, is fully fenced with key card-operated, monitored security gates. The Sands Lifestyle Village Residents Association is a group of residents of the village that promotes the social life of the village.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000069">The association was advised that, even if alcohol is not being sold at association events but is brought by residents to those events and a cover charge is levied for food or entertainment, the association needs a limited club liquor licence pursuant to section 36(3) of the Liquor Licensing Act 1997.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000070">The association applied for such a licence, which was refused yesterday. A resident of the village has contacted me to indicate his objection to the Sands community needing to get a licence to consume alcohol within its own community. Other South Australians do not need a licence to consume alcohol in their home or with their friends in their neighbourhood, so why should retirement village residents be treated differently? Does the minister consider appropriate the application of liquor licensing laws to regulate social interaction within closed residential communities? Will the government review the act to deal with this anomaly?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:31:00" />
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000071">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:31): </by> As members would be well aware, the commissioner's authority and the Liquor Licensing Court is quite independent of me. It would be most inappropriate for me to interfere with those decisions.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000072">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="62">The Hon. S.G. Wade interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000073">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> I am sure the honourable member is not suggesting that I intervene in that respect. I am completely unaware of this particular event. It would have gone to the court and been dealt with using the appropriate processes. To the best of my knowledge, residents of the village have not written to me and/or raised their concerns with my office. I am unaware of this issue and I do not have any background on it.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000074">These decisions are made independently of me. Obviously, the principles behind these sorts of decisions are about public interest, balancing a community's needs, and the importance of communities being able to have social events and a good time, with the broader community's interests. I know that is always a tricky balancing act. I do not know of this particular example. I am not aware of what submissions were made against the issuing of this licence.</text>
        <text id="20091029c03fafa9b76f40aeb0000075">I am more than happy, if the honourable member gives me some details, to follow it up in order to ensure that a proper process was adhered to. I am sure the honourable member would not want me to interfere with the independent court's decision.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>