<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3815" />
  <endPage num="3861" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sands Lifestyle Village</name>
      <text id="20091029d6428cdd5e874ca380000076">
        <heading>SANDS LIFESTYLE VILLAGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-29">
            <name>SANDS LIFESTYLE VILLAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:34:00" />
        <text id="20091029d6428cdd5e874ca380000077">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:34): </by> I have a supplementary question. My question was not about the processes but, rather, the policy and the legislation that lies behind it. Will the minister consider not merely the process but, rather, whether the policy underlying the legislation and the legislation itself need to be adjusted?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-29">
            <name>SANDS LIFESTYLE VILLAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:34:00" />
        <page num="3819" />
        <text id="20091029d6428cdd5e874ca380000078">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:34): </by> If I have received complaints, there would be very few in relation to this issue around our legislation being far too onerous on smaller communities. This is one of the rare times—in fact, I cannot recall any other times, but it is likely that there have been some—that I have received a complaint about this. So, it would be unlikely on the ground of this one complaint that I have been made aware of that I would review a whole policy. I am happy to look at it but, as I said, it is not an issue that has been brought to my attention previously. I certainly would have received very few complaints and concerns about this, but I am happy to take a quick look at it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>