<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3689" />
  <endPage num="3818" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Thinker in Residence</name>
      <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000394">
        <heading>THINKER IN RESIDENCE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>THINKER IN RESIDENCE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:18:00" />
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000395">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (15:18):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Did the government seek any advice from Professor Lee in relation to the location of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital and the suitability of that parcel of land for such a development?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>THINKER IN RESIDENCE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:19:00" />
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000396">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:19):</by>  Those decisions had been made well before Professor Lee's residency, I understand. However, Professor Lee—</text>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000397">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000398">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000399">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  As I said, the decisions relating to the Royal Adelaide Hospital predated Professor Lee's visit. I look forward to her report. What I think is a tragedy for this state is that the Liberal opposition has decided to end the Thinkers in Residence program. The tragedy is that the Liberal Party has decided that it can do without the views of these international experts and the views of someone who is recognised as having the finest architecture school in the United States, who has devoted a lot of time to improving our knowledge and giving us guidance as to how the city might go forward. They think they have all the expertise opposite.</text>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000400">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="57">The Hon. T.J. Stephens interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000401">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000402">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  It's pathetic. These are the people who think they have all the answers for Adelaide. The fact that—</text>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000403">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="3717" />
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000404">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  While we are on the subject of urban design, I think it was very refreshing to hear this morning that the Prime Minister has announced that the commonwealth government will again be re-engaged in the question of the future of our cities. If one looks at when Perth electrified its railway system, and the Subiaco development, one will see that it was funding under the Better Cities program of the Keating government. When did Brisbane have its rail electrification? It was during the Whitlam government. Liberal governments have totally neglected urban development in this country. They have totally neglected our cities. I am delighted that we now have a federal government that will support the higher quality of our cities.</text>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000405">As I have said, we have had this very significant investment. In particular, the electrification of our railway system is something that is long overdue in this city; it is absolutely necessary for the future development of our city. It is very refreshing that we now have a federal government that is interested in urban design. It just shows by contrast how members opposite and their party totally neglected this area during their years in government.</text>
        <text id="20091028100e7a8619484a2cb0000406">As I have said, the fact that we had someone of the calibre of Professor Lee here to provide advice to our community in relation to urban design and improving the built form in this city was terrific. I think the fact that it should be so dismissed by members opposite is a sad reflection on where their priorities lie.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>