<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3689" />
  <endPage num="3818" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bushfire Bunkers</name>
      <text id="20091028ebfb7bb850d146bc90000277">
        <heading>BUSHFIRE BUNKERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>BUSHFIRE BUNKERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20091028ebfb7bb850d146bc90000278">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:39):</by>  I have a further supplementary question. Would the minister accept the criticism that the government is being overly cautious because it is couching as consumer advice what should be clear bushfire prevention advice that bunkers should not be built until the national standards are released?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>BUSHFIRE BUNKERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20091028ebfb7bb850d146bc90000279">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:39):</by>  I have already put on record the list of the parameters that have been assessed as needing to be addressed to the satisfaction of suitably qualified professionals for a fire bunker to be considered safe, and that is on the best technical and scientific advice we have received. They are the matters that need to be addressed, and they are comprehensive. The cautionary note is comprehensive and, in terms of the code, that is being undertaken at the moment. I believe that the government is not being overly cautious; we are being responsible.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>