<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3571" />
  <endPage num="3644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000450">
        <heading>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T15:09:00" />
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000451">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T15:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (15:09):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Urban Development and Planning. On 6 July, the government unveiled the historic 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide, a blueprint for tackling the economic and environmental challenges that face our generation. As the deadline for feedback from the public closed on 30 September, will the minister provide an update on the response from the community on this important strategic document?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T15:10:00" />
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000452">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:10): </by> About two weeks ago the deadline closed for people to have their say about the draft 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide. Adelaide is where we live and it is important that we seek input from individuals, councils, industry and community groups about the plan for tackling the challenges that lie ahead in the next three decades.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000453">The draft plan is a major forward looking document, the likes of which have not been seen in South Australia since the 1960s post-war baby boomer population expansion. This is a new vision that addresses issues being faced in the 21<sup>st</sup> century about where we live, work and travel and relate to our environment, but it also draws on the legacy created by Colonel Light in the original plan for Adelaide.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000454">With the release of this draft plan this government has recognised the absolute necessity of forward planning as an important tool in guiding policy decisions in key areas, such as infrastructure, which includes housing, health, education, transport (for the benefit of the Leader of the Opposition) and water security.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000455">Adelaide is already recognised as one of the world's most liveable cities. Our parklands, public spaces, heritage buildings, character streetscapes and proximity to both the hills and sea are all attributes that make our city a desirable place in which to live. Maintaining and improving the liveability of our city is one of the key objectives of the draft plan for Greater Adelaide.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000456">The centrepiece of our approach will be to encourage transit oriented development and infill opportunities around transit corridors. Some of the ways in which these will contribute to liveability are:</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000457">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">increasing densities around stations and transport interchanges that encourage the creation of walkable, safe and connected, less car reliant neighbourhoods;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000458">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">placing emphasis on good design and mixed use precincts that create distinct neighbourhoods with their own character and identity; and</item>
        </text>
        <page num="3605" />
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000459">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">encouraging a diversity of housing that allows people to move from a house on a large block of land to a townhouse or apartment, but not have to move away from their existing community.</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000460">Given the rapid ageing of the population, the number of people aged 65 and over will increase from about 18 per cent to 22 per cent of the population over the course of this period. I think just about everyone in this parliament will be included in that group over the next 30 years, so the proportion will go from 18 per cent to 22 per cent. Clearly, in order to have diversity of housing that allows people to move from areas where they currently live to more complex, dense living in their neighbourhood is incredibly important.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000461">Since the launch of the draft plan in July there has been a comprehensive program to advise and inform business, industry, local government and the community. Public comment is vital in developing a final version of this major strategic plan. At last count, the Department of Planning and Local Government had received more than 570 submissions. On 30 September, when the deadline closed, we had received—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000462">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire: </by> I have one in there.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000463">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> If it was in early it would have been one of the 350 we had at lunch on the last day, but a number of submissions were received subsequent to the deadline or in the mail the next morning. Obviously, we have included those submissions so it is now more than 570 submissions.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000464">More than half the submissions have been lodged by individual South Australians. The remaining submissions have been received from councils, academics, industry, business and community groups, as well as government agencies. During the community consultation period the government faced a campaign of disinformation and misinformation, including things about maps and the colour of maps.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000465">We had a campaign of misinformation. We had population growth forecasts, which we were told were overblown. Population forecasts were wilfully distorted and we had the expected carping about editorial and technical detail. Most of that criticism was a diversion, rather than a critique of the basic objectives of the 30-year plan. Much of the feedback, as a result of early review of the submissions, indicates that people are generally supportive of the thrust of the plan, although naturally there is some criticism about how it applies to specific regions, especially in terms of getting the planning right for  infrastructure and services. No doubt there are those who are opposed to it. Of course, there are some people who are opposed to any growth at all, while others support growth, just somewhere else, not in their part of Adelaide.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000466">Greater Adelaide covers a large metropolitan semi-rural area from Gawler in the north to Victor Harbor in the south out towards Murray Bridge in the east and Gulf St Vincent to the west. We need to create a framework for sustainable growth to accommodate the expected population growth of 560,000, up to 282,000 new jobs required and 258,000 additional dwellings during the next 30 years. Other features of the draft 30-year plan include planning the development of about 60 per cent of new housing within metropolitan Adelaide within 800 metres of a transit corridor, increasing housing density, particularly around mass transit hubs and corridors and bringing housing, jobs, transport and services into these mixed use developments to reduce the need for people to drive their motor vehicles.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000467">Also, of course, is the capitalising on record infrastructure spending, currently running at more than $11 billion over the next four years, including more than $2.5 billion in public transport upgrades. It is interesting that the Leader of the Opposition talks about a plan; I would have thought $2.5 billion worth of additional spending—$2.5 billion in public transport upgrades—is the policy that you want to have. I suppose what we will get from members opposite is an unfunded plan about doing something they have no intention of doing. This government is actually delivering real dollars—billions of dollars—in relation to the upgrading of infrastructure; I think something like seven times the level that existed prior to this government coming to office.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000468">The draft 30-year plan also protects up to 375,000 hectares of significant agricultural land and earmarks about 5,000 hectares of land designated for employment opportunities. Also, of course, we are committed to ensuring a 25 year rolling supply of land, with 15 years zoned supply for future urban development. This will keep housing prices in Adelaide competitive and will support the affordable housing targets. I take this opportunity to thank all those residents of Greater Adelaide who took the time to obtain a copy of the draft plan and lodge a submission with the Department of Planning and Local Government.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000469">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000470">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! If you want to waste the last five minutes of question time, keep interjecting.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000471">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> I was acknowledging your indication that the debate should cease so that you could deal with those interruptions from members opposite. I would like to get this on the record, because I would like to thank all those members of Greater Adelaide who took the time to obtain a draft plan and lodge a submission with the Department of Planning and Local Government. I am delighted that so many individuals, community groups and organisations have taken the time to contribute to this blueprint for tackling these economic and environmental challenges that face our generation. These submissions will be used together with feedback from regional meetings held throughout Greater Adelaide during the past three months to determine the final shape of the 30-year plan.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000472">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000473">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> It is amazing how members opposite are always making this spurious claim that somehow or other this government does not believe in community consultation. As soon as we talk about it, what do they do? They totally ignore it and try to ridicule it. They really are a divided group that is looking for somewhere. They are like a dog chasing its tail; they really do not know the direction they are going in. These submissions will be used to help shape the final 30-year plan. Local government and industry have also played a key role in reviewing the plan and its contents and holding specific events to discuss the targets and strategies within the draft plan.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000474">The response to the 30-year plan shows the absolute necessity of providing forward planning as an important tool to guide government decision making in key policy areas such as infrastructure, housing, health, education, transport and water security. If the honourable member looks at the plan he will see where much of the indicated future transport is located, but of course it is a 30-year plan. Some of that will be indicative.</text>
        <text id="20091015fe6dea3f4e1b4eaaa0000475">This government is not arrogant enough to suggest that we can determine everything that will happen in the next 30 years, but in the immediate future and over the next five years we will be putting an incredibly substantially large amount of money—billions of dollars—into our infrastructure. The final version of this document will give South Australia one of the most competitive planning systems in Australia, while ensuring that Adelaide remains one of the most liveable, competitive and sustainable cities in the world.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>