<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3571" />
  <endPage num="3644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gawler Racecourse Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20091015284e3ffdb0aa4cfbb0000355">
        <heading>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
        <text id="20091015284e3ffdb0aa4cfbb0000356">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:45): </by> I have a supplementary question. In relation to the ministerial development plan amendment, can the minister advise what role private planning consultants played in the writing of that plan; and, in particular, was Connor Holmes involved?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
        <text id="20091015284e3ffdb0aa4cfbb0000357">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:45): </by> As I said, this is a ministerial development plan amendment, which is obviously under the control of the government. Who actually did the work for the Gawler Racecourse I will have to check. I will get the information from the department and respond to the honourable member as to who prepared the proposal on behalf of the racing authority.</text>
        <text id="20091015284e3ffdb0aa4cfbb0000358">I remind the honourable member that, again, it being a ministerial development plan, it is the department that conducts the process. Obviously, input comes from the racecourse because we need to know what they were proposing. It would not make much sense if you were to do a development plan amendment that did not reflect what the racecourse was proposing. That would be a bit bizarre. So, of course, we will reflect what they want. As to which consultants they have used, I will seek that information.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>