<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3571" />
  <endPage num="3644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gawler Racecourse Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000346">
        <heading>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:42:00" />
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000347">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:42): </by> By way of further supplementary question, is the minister aware that the usual practice is for members of parliament, local government officials and developers to be heard first rather than members of the community?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>GAWLER RACECOURSE REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:42:00" />
        <page num="3598" />
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000348">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:42): </by> The Development Policy Advisory Committee is in charge of the consultation. I imagine that it makes common sense that, when you are to have consultation, at least a discussion on the proposal should take place. Would it not make sense, if you are to have public consultation on what is to happen at Gawler Racecourse, and would be in everyone's interest to have Thoroughbred Racing, the Gawler and Barossa Jockey Club or whoever is proposing in this instance to outline the details first so there can be a more constructive discussion? If that is what DPAC decides to do, I can thoroughly understand it and it would have my full support. If it wants to do it another way, that is up to it. I do not tell it how to conduct its meetings.</text>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000349">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="10">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000350">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> If I was there I would be accused of influencing the outcome. People have already suggested that somehow there has been the involvement of Mr Bolkus and so on. Since this development plan came up I certainly have not spoken to Mr Bolkus at all in relation to this matter—</text>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000351">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000352">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! If the Hon. Mr Lucas has a question, he can get on his feet and ask it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000353">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> —during the period this matter has been proposed. It was something put forward by Thoroughbred Racing South Australia and the Gawler race club some several years ago. It makes sense, and I notice the Hon. John Dawkins has already said that he supports it. Anyone with any interest in racing would understand—and I hope the Hon. Terry Stephens with his committee also understands—the importance of enabling Gawler Racecourse to be redeveloped to become a much more important race track in the conduct of racing throughout South Australia.</text>
        <text id="200910150d551565e623427ca0000354">I hope all of us with an interest in racing would agree that this proposal is in the best interests. Obviously there will be local issues. To enable this development to go ahead, the Gawler Racecourse is selling off some land. Some of that land can be used for the school, which will be great for the school, and there will be a realigning of roads. A whole lot of other benefits will result and they will affect local residents. Local residents should have their say in that regard, but it would be helpful at any meeting if people are first appraised of exactly what is proposed, and I encourage people to find out what is proposed in the plan and put in their submission so that they can be heard at the public meeting.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>