<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3499" />
  <endPage num="3572" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside City Council</name>
      <text id="20091014363d4ba5ece644a290000121">
        <heading>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-14">
            <name>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-14T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20091014363d4ba5ece644a290000122">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-14T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON (15:00): </by> As a supplementary question arising from the answer, is it the fact then, minister, that you approved the extension of the inquiry before you had any estimate of the likely cost of that extension?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-14">
            <name>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-14T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20091014363d4ba5ece644a290000123">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-14T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:00): </by> Yes; in terms of costing, the honourable member is absolutely right. The full scoping of this exercise is only being done now, as I have indicated. Initially, we did not have a full understanding of the uptake, particularly of the public part of that inquiry; and I do not think that one person in this chamber would believe that, given the circumstances of this case, it was not a proper and sound thing to do, that is, to open up the investigation to the public so that ordinary members of the public could have the opportunity to deliver evidence to the investigator.</text>
        <text id="20091014363d4ba5ece644a290000124">Unfortunately, that costs money. It does extend the length of the inquiry and it costs money. It is most important that this investigation be done thoroughly, and we will pay what it costs. The investigator has outlined a much better indication of the scope. That now needs to be costed in detail, and my agency is doing that at present.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>