<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-09-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3185" />
  <endPage num="3261" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20090922b5c2a7459c474a5ca0000063">
        <heading>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-22">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-22T14:36:00" />
        <text id="20090922b5c2a7459c474a5ca0000064">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-22T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:36): </by> I have a supplementary question. Is it the government's intention to rezone land in these corridors for higher density housing, and is any of the land included in the 80 per cent of Adelaide which the government says it will not be rezoning?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-22">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-22T14:36:00" />
        <text id="20090922b5c2a7459c474a5ca0000065">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-22T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:36): </by> Once consultation has concluded, we will then look at the final proposal for Adelaide's 30-year plan. That will encapsulate whatever are the agreed objectives, and then the detail of that will be implemented. We can say that, on the basis of the research that has been undertaken and without too much disruption to this city—as I said, affecting no more than 20 per cent of the current area—we can accommodate 70 per cent of the future expected population growth within the current boundaries. That is the objective.</text>
        <page num="3188" />
        <text id="20090922b5c2a7459c474a5ca0000066">It is all very well for members opposite to try to raise doubts and to try to do things about that. It will be a hard ask, but what is the alternative? What is the Greens' policy. Do nothing? Have no growth or do nothing? The fact is that this government is setting out a way in which we believe that we can get the best value for every dollar of infrastructure that will be available in the next 30 years. It will be hard, but the best way we can do it is by concentrating the growth that we have along major transport corridors, because that will achieve a number of the objectives that we need simultaneously and it will have minimum impact upon the existing suburbs. Whatever the final form, if we achieve this objective over 30 years (and there is a long way to go yet) it will be one in which 80 per cent of the current suburbs will be untouched.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>