<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-09-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3185" />
  <endPage num="3261" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000207">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Roxby Downs Council</name>
      <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000208">
        <heading>ROXBY DOWNS COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-22">
            <name>ROXBY DOWNS COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-22T15:24:00" />
        <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000209">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-22T15:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:24): </by> I have a supplementary question. Do I take it from the minister's comments that the terms of reference of the advisory committee preclude it from considering a democratically elected council as an accountability mechanism?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-22">
            <name>ROXBY DOWNS COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-22T15:24:00" />
        <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000210">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-22T15:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:24): </by> This particular group has a charter to ensure that there is a level of accountability. Some other mechanisms have been adopted within the town to ensure that there is public input.</text>
        <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000211">The point I am making is that with the expansion decision to be made in the next 12 months it is not the government's view, nor the view of BHP I would suggest, that it would be appropriate at this time to change those arrangements because the town is about to undergo significant changes.</text>
        <text id="20090922fdb57aeb5dd64c20a0000212">The other issue that would have to be addressed is, of course, funding. As I said, the town deficit is something in the order of $1.5 million a year, which is half-funded through PIRSA and half-funded through BHP. Those issues would also have to be addressed. However, while we believe that this particular group does provide a greater level of scrutiny over the decisions of local government, we also believe that the current arrangement should remain in place until the expansion is approved and complete. Then, given the greater size, the matter can, and should, be revisited.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>