<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-09-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3025" />
  <endPage num="3077" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Port Lincoln, Planning</name>
      <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000433">
        <heading>PORT LINCOLN, PLANNING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>PORT LINCOLN, PLANNING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000434">In reply to <by role="member" id="3130">the Hon. M. PARNELL</by> (5 March 2009).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>PORT LINCOLN, PLANNING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000435">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business):</by>  I thank the Honourable Member for the opportunity to respond to his supplementary question about the City of Port Lincoln Building Heights and Design (City Centre) Development Plan Amendment (DPA).</text>
        <page num="3048" />
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000436">As indicated previously, the purpose of the Building Heights and Design Centre (City Centre) DPA is to address a lack of policy in the existing Development Plan with regards to the height and design of buildings in the city centre of Port Lincoln.</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000437">The Department of Planning and Local Government has recently forwarded its advice to me on the DPA. This advice includes a review of all public and agency submissions.</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000438">When considering the DPA for final approval I will take into account all concerns raised in the submissions and any recommendations of my department. One of the options available to me is to refer the DPA to the Independent Development Policy Advisory Committee for further consideration. I will make my decision on this matter shortly.</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000439">Specifically, in relation to the supplementary question put forward by the Honourable Member:</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000440">The DPA was approved by me for interim operation approval at the commencement of the consultation period on 21 August 2008. This was requested by Council in order to prevent development occurring during the consultation stage which would be contrary to the intent of the DPA. In this case there was a lack of policy in the existing development Plan with regards to the height and design of buildings in the city centre of Port Lincoln.</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000441">Indeed I am advised that Council was infact approached by development interests in mid 2007 regarding a proposal for a 13 storey building in a area of the City Centre. The use of interim operation is a standard practice and allows the merits of the proposed policy to be examined without any prejudicial development occurring during the consultation period.</text>
        <text id="20090908f4fde0d890a34b2290000442">Interim operation of the DPA is due to lapse on 21 August 2009.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>