<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-09-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3025" />
  <endPage num="3077" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ecotourist Village</name>
      <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000283">
        <heading>ECOTOURIST VILLAGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>ECOTOURIST VILLAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-08T15:02:00" />
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000284">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-08T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (15:02):</by>  Will the Minister for Urban Development and Planning provide any information about a proposal to develop an ecotourist village near Streaky Bay on Eyre Peninsula?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>ECOTOURIST VILLAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-08T15:02:00" />
        <page num="3038" />
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000285">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-08T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:02):</by>  I recently announced my decision to declare as a major development a proposal to build an ecotourist village at Cape Bauer on Eyre Peninsula. The declaration of a major development is consistent with the Eyre Peninsula coastal development strategy, which allows the provision of medium scale tourism development in coastal environments only after a detailed assessment of the landscape and the cultural, social and economic impacts or benefits.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000286">The proposed development site, about 15 kilometres north-west of Streaky Bay, is currently zoned coastal and primary industry and is recognised for its natural clifftop scenery. The proponent, Streaky Bay Joint Venture Group Pty Ltd, is a joint venture company which has been established to develop this ecotourism resort and residential development. The proposal envisages the construction of ecotourism resort and seasonal holiday accommodation on about 150 hectares, comprising conference facilities, services of meals and drinks at the restaurant, recreational activities, a resort shop, 12 hotel-motel style room accommodation, 22 self-contained service coastal villas, and 30 individual dwellings on small allotments providing owner-occupied holiday accommodation.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000287">It is proposed that about 320 hectares of land will be developed for rural residential purposes resulting in about 300 allotments ranging in size from one to two hectares. The proposal also includes significant areas of habitat restoration and revegetation, including about 675 hectares of coastal dune habitat and 53 hectares of remnant mallee and tea tree scrub.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000288">The nature of the Cape Bauer proposal on the environmentally sensitive Eyre Peninsula coast near Streaky Bay warrants an assessment under the major development provisions. The Independent Development Assessment Commission will now determine the level of scrutiny required for this project.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000289">South Australia's major development provisions are not a fast track, nor is it a guarantee that a project will go ahead. The major development process allows proposed projects to be subject to the most stringent planning approval process available under the state's development laws. The declaration does not signal the government's support for a project but, rather, triggers a much stricter development assessment process than is available through local council development approval panels. It is a process which allows input from local councils—incidentally, the council supports the project and, indeed, came to the government with the proponent requesting it be made a major development—state government agencies and the South Australian community.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000290">Applications are scrutinised by the independent Development Assessment Commission, which has the power to request an environmental impact statement (EIS), public environmental report (PER) or a development report (DR). The commission is also responsible for establishing the guidelines for preparing the targeted EIS for the development report. The proponent is required to respond to all submissions, including any of the matters raised by local councils, before final assessment by the minister.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000291">Often, authorisation allows the government to impose conditions that must be met before a project can go ahead. Proponents also risk the prospect of an early no and are unable to appeal the final decision. The EIS guidelines and more detail about the major development assessment process can be found online. Obviously, at this early stage, the final proposal is yet to be received from the proponent.</text>
        <text id="20090908759f01758dbe49b2a0000292">Since taking up the position of Minister for Urban Development and Planning in March 2005, I have declared about 16 project, ranging from the Olympic Dam expansion to the upgrading of lights at AAMI Stadium, as major developments, which is an average of about four projects a year. The Cape Bauer proposal is the first to be declared in 2009. I think it would be difficult for anyone but anti-development zealots to argue, based on those numbers, that this is an overused provision of the Development Act.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>