<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-07-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2845" />
  <endPage num="2927" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Legislative Council Reform</name>
      <text id="20090715359481dd25ee4ec2a0000196">
        <heading>LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T15:22:00" />
        <text id="20090715359481dd25ee4ec2a0000197">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T15:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:22):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Now that the minister has referred to the reduction of the numbers in the Legislative Council and the convention that the Legislative Council has generally been half the number of members in the House of Assembly, why did he and the other Rann government ministers choose to reduce the number of members in the Legislative Council by six and not choose to reduce the number in the House of Assembly by 12?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T15:22:00" />
        <text id="20090715359481dd25ee4ec2a0000198">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T15:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:22):</by>  The Legislative Council does not have a nexus provision as is the case with the Commonwealth Constitution. There are reasons for that being the case in the Senate, which for a start has a different composition. Each state has the same number of representatives regardless—</text>
        <text id="20090715359481dd25ee4ec2a0000199">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090715359481dd25ee4ec2a0000200">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  In Tasmania, the upper house has single-member electorates and the lower house has multiple member electorates. So, there are differences. The fact is that the Tasmanian parliament has reduced its numbers but, as I understand it from speaking to people from Tasmania, that parliament has been able to cope with all its traditional functions. There is no nexus provision in the South Australian Constitution as is the case in the Senate and, as I have said, we do not have the peculiarities of the Senate, where each state, even the smaller states such as Tasmania, have the same number of senators as the larger states, such as New South Wales.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>