<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-07-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2845" />
  <endPage num="2927" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Abuse</name>
      <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000128">
        <heading>CHILD ABUSE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>CHILD ABUSE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T14:59:00" />
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000129">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T14:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:59):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Families and Communities a question.</text>
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000130">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="2854" />
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000131">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  An answer that I recently received to a question on notice confirmed that Families SA regularly ignores pleas from the Family Court and the federal Magistrates Court for intervention in cases of very serious child abuse. Pursuant to sections 91B and 92A of the Family Law Act, judges and magistrates can request state child welfare agencies to urgently intervene in child custody and access proceedings if they fear that a child 'has been abused or is at risk of being abused.' These sorts of requests are usually made of Families SA when there are grave fears by a judge for a child's welfare or safety. They are not idle or ill-considered requests; these are pleas by family law judges and magistrates for welfare to intervene in respect of a child's safety.</text>
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000132">An answer that I received recently to another question on notice indicated that, of approximately 30 such requests received by Families SA in 2007, it intervened only twice. In 2008, Families SA received 26 such requests for intervention from 1 January to 30 September that year, and the Minister for Families and Communities indicated that, in response to these requests for urgent intervention, Families SA provided 26 written responses. That indicates to me that there were zero actual interventions last year. Apparently Families SA did not respond to these urgent requests for intervention on even one occasion. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000133">1.&amp;#x9;Will the minister confirm that Families SA did not intervene in any Family Court cases in 2008, despite requests to do so from the courts?</text>
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000134">2.&amp;#x9;If it did not intervene following a request, why not?</text>
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000135">3.&amp;#x9;How many requests for urgent intervention in Family Court or federal Magistrates Court proceedings have been received by Families SA so far this year, and how many have been agreed to and acted upon?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T15:01:00" />
        <text id="20090715a54e4c6c49f849b090000136">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:01):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his important questions. I will refer them to the Minister for Families and Communities in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>