<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-07-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2845" />
  <endPage num="2927" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mount Barker</name>
      <text id="2009071551f88c03e86f4d01a0000124">
        <heading>MOUNT BARKER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T14:58:00" />
        <text id="2009071551f88c03e86f4d01a0000125">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:58):</by>  I have a supplementary question. In relation to the draft ministerial development plan amendment that the minister referred to, can the minister confirm whether the appropriately-qualified person required under legislation to take control of that project is, in fact, a person associated with the consulting firm of Connor Holmes?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T14:58:00" />
        <text id="2009071551f88c03e86f4d01a0000126">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:58):</by>  The honourable member was not listening. I said that the ministerial development plan will be under the control of the Department of Planning and Local Government as, indeed, all ministerial development plans are. As I also indicated in relation to that matter, the landowners—the honourable member can call them developers if he likes or landowner/developers; they are the landowners—have engaged their own planning consultants to provide documentation towards the process. However, the process will be under the control of the Department of Planning and Local Government and it will be conducted in conjunction with the Mount Barker council.</text>
        <text id="2009071551f88c03e86f4d01a0000127">With these sorts of significant development plan amendments, particularly ministerial ones, some of that documentation is provided from the landowners or through the planning consultants that landowners employ but it is all double-checked by the department. We get input from other government departments but the process itself is very much under the control of the Department of Planning and Local Government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>