<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-07-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2801" />
  <endPage num="2845" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside City Council</name>
      <text id="2009071442da2a42d13e4789b0000143">
        <heading>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-14">
            <name>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-14T15:01:00" />
        <text id="2009071442da2a42d13e4789b0000144">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-14T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:01):</by>  As a supplementary question, is the minister advising the council that she believes it was appropriate that the letter be considered in an in-confidence meeting but that it was inappropriate for the gallery to be cleared by police?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-14">
            <name>BURNSIDE CITY COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-14T15:02:00" />
        <text id="2009071442da2a42d13e4789b0000145">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-14T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:02):</by>  I have already clarified what I believe in relation to the issue to do with the clearing of the gallery and the bringing in of the police. In relation to the discussion in respect of the correspondence, what I requested and what I believe was proper is that any matter pertaining to those issues raised in the letter that would have dealt with individual and personal divulging of information should have been treated in a confidential way.</text>
        <text id="2009071442da2a42d13e4789b0000146">If there were general discussions or general statements to be made about the council's response, I imagine there would be a number of examples where it would have been appropriate for the council to engage with members of the public in the gallery. For instance, providing a reasonable explanation to the gallery as to what process the council had intended to adopt in providing a response and how it needed to go about doing that would not have breached the confidentiality of the letter. That could have addressed some of those matters, and I think it would have been a very helpful way to proceed.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>