<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2643" />
  <endPage num="2723" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Consumer Compliance and Enforcement</name>
      <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000041">
        <heading>CONSUMER COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-17">
            <name>CONSUMER COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-17T14:27:00" />
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000042">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-17T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:27): </by> I seek leave to ask the Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs a question about consumer compliance and enforcement.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000043">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000044">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK: </by> Honourable members may recall that I asked a question about a <term>Choice</term> report in April this year, in which it was stated that the Australian Consumers Association had conducted a survey and placed the South Australian OCBA in its lowest rankings. The article states:</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000045">
          <inserted>Experts regarded the quality of available enforcement options to be less than adequate. They made little comment and observed that the flexibility of these options was 'fairly standard' and the scope was 'basic'. They also rated the available remedies as less than adequate, and observed that they 'do not allow for innovation'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000046">It also refers to inadequate policy in relation to consumer risk, and states:</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000047">
          <inserted>Although...OCBA has a Strategic Plan, it does not specifically target its enforcement resources to particular areas of consumer risk...There is no evidence of a review process in the Strategic Plan.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000048">The minister in her reply stated that OCBA has undertaken a review and believes that these issues have been addressed. In the recent budget I note that, under sub-program 12.3, 'Compliance and Enforcement', the targets of performance indicators for 2009-10 are lower than they were for 2007-08 in that, under 'Performance Indicators', the number of alleged prima facie breaches investigated, warning letters issued, assurances taken and disciplines and prosecution briefs prepared are in every instance lower than they were two years ago. So my question to the minister is: on what basis does she say that these reviews have taken place and that enforcement has become a high priority for this government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-06-17T14:30:00" />
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000049">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-17T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:30): </by> I would have thought that this would be left as an estimates question. Nevertheless, I am more than happy to answer it.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000050">Indeed, in December 2008 <term>Choice</term> released its final report on its assessment of the fair trading agencies and, indeed, our South Australian Office of Consumer and Business Affairs was considered to have a rating below standard. As I have placed on record already, at the time the <term>Choice</term> review was being conducted, the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs was, in fact, undertaking a significant structural review of its office, roles and functions around many of the areas identified in that report, and some changes have occurred and many are under way.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000051">I also reported in this place that a new Director, Compliance and Enforcement has been appointed recently in the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs. That officer is reviewing compliance and enforcement activities and a number of other processes within the office and, clearly, is giving regard and consideration to the recommendations in the <term>Choice</term> report.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000052">Also, in November last year, I introduced the Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Fair Trading) Bill into the Legislative Council, and this bill offers substantial changes to penalties, and also increased powers to authorised officers. So, as members can see, a number of things have been put in place and are continuing to be put in place to address those issues identified in the <term>Choice</term> report.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000053">In relation to the number of investigations, I would need to check my dates, but I know that one year a large number of investigations was conducted under a particular initiative, and I am happy to check that and bring those details here. Obviously, those numbers vary from year to year. The monitoring program that the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs has in place is very rigorous, and we see evidence of that regularly.</text>
        <page num="2646" />
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000054">For instance, each year we check show bags and each year we monitor children's Christmas toy sales. Just yesterday in this place, in answer to a question—and, obviously, members were again not interested and did not listen—I clearly outlined an initiative that the office was conducting on Eyre Peninsula, including Port Lincoln, around measurements, and officers are checking that scales and other measurements at shop counters and petrol pumps are also included. I know you would be interested in that, Mr President. A range of other measures is being monitored by the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000055">Only a matter of months ago, also in response to a question in this place, I announced that we were checking that the midyear sales offers were, in fact, genuine. I released media reports about that and made the public aware that officers were out checking to ensure that these midyear sales were genuine.</text>
        <text id="200906170271e149a1ca417ea0000056">So, off the top of my head, I can list a number of initiatives that I have talked about in this place within just a matter of a few weeks. As I said, in terms of overall figures, they would be expected to vary from year to year.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>