<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-06-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2603" />
  <endPage num="2643" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Ship Construction International</name>
      <page num="2621" />
      <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000387">
        <heading>ADELAIDE SHIP CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-16">
            <name>ADELAIDE SHIP CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-16T15:26:00" />
        <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000388">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-16T15:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (15:26):</by>  I have a supplementary question. In view of the minister's answer in relation to the high value of the waterfront land, can the minister confirm that the government does not have an alternative use for that land in its supporting this massive rise in rent, and does the government still have a focus on medium-size ship building, or is it all about warship building?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-16">
            <name>ADELAIDE SHIP CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-16T15:26:00" />
        <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000389">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-16T15:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:26):</by>  As I have said, it is my understanding that the rent has not been increased in seven years. This is leased land, but the price of all land has probably more than doubled in the past seven years, certainly in the case of residential property.</text>
        <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000390">Clearly, if one was doubling the rent because property values have doubled, that may not be an unreasonable thing to do. Nonetheless, as I said in my answer, there are special factors in relation to this. The government is aware of those special factors, and I am sure my colleague will be seeking to ensure a reasonable outcome. In relation to the proposition put by the honourable member, the government would obviously want Adelaide Ship Construction to continue. I have been out there myself, and I have seen prawn vessels being launched there. Obviously, it is an important industry in this state but, equally, if it is on significant—</text>
        <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000391">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200906167256a19011fb4c5690000392">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Are they being screwed? That is the question: what is a fair rent? Defence SA has undertaken negotiations, and I am sure that my colleague will be able to reach a reasonable outcome.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>