<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-06-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2551" />
  <endPage num="2603" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Livestock Transport Legislation</name>
      <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000852">
        <heading>LIVESTOCK TRANSPORT LEGISLATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-04">
            <name>LIVESTOCK TRANSPORT LEGISLATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-04T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000853">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-04T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER (15:12):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister, representing the Minister for Transport, a question on livestock transport legislation.</text>
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000854">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000855">
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER: </by> The Livestock Carriers Association of South Australia is holding its annual conference this weekend and, as part of its press release, the President, Mr David Smith of Tumby Bay, said that drivers are still struggling to comply with fatigue laws eight months after the regulations were introduced. The biggest thing is that everyone is scared of the new laws and, instead of trying to embrace them, people are struggling to come to terms with the very complicated fine details.</text>
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000856">Conflicting laws were evident in the scenario of drivers running out of hours within half an hour of their destination. He has said that he might have a driver who needs to stop half an hour from Murray Bridge, even though he has only another half an hour to drive. If that driver has a truck full of livestock and has to stop in high temperatures for seven hours to have a break, he is then in breach of the Australian Animal Welfare Standards for the Transport of Livestock.</text>
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000857">Long haul drivers are losing the flexibility of working 12 days in 14, because they now have to take a day off every six days, which could mean they have to take a day off in the middle of their trip when they just want to get home. Clearly these laws do not pass the common sense test. When this legislation was introduced into this place we asked a series of questions, pointing out the anomalies within the legislation and we were assured at the time that common sense and flexibility would apply, particularly to livestock transporters, and that consideration for animal welfare would be taken into account. Clearly, this has not happened. Did the minister deliberately mislead this place and the Livestock Transport Association? If not, when and how soon can we expect common sense amendments to that legislation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-06-04T15:14:00" />
        <text id="20090604631cf9fbd6dc450ca0000858">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-04T15:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:14): </by> I will refer the honourable member's questions to the Minister for Transport in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>