<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2465" />
  <endPage num="2554" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Motions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bushfires</name>
      <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000527">
        <heading>BUSHFIRES</heading>
      </text>
      <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000528">Adjourned debate on motion of Hon. C.V. Schaefer:</text>
      <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000529">
        <inserted>That the Natural Resources Committee inquire into and report on any proposal, matter or issue concerned with bushfire.</inserted>
      </text>
      <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000530">
        <inserted>(Continued from 8 April 2009. Page 1922.)</inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3263" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2009-06-03T17:42:00" />
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000531">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-03T17:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3263">The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH (17:42):</by>  I will make a few brief remarks. I support the Hon. Caroline Schaefer's motion that the Natural Resources Committee inquires into and reports on any proposal, matter or issue concerned with bushfire. I do not pretend to know a lot about bushfires. I missed the 1983 bushfire in Adelaide. I watched the 2005 Eyre Peninsula bushfire from the safety of Yorke Peninsula as a column of smoke. Therefore, I do not pretend to be any sort of an expert. However, a couple of things have become clear to me over the course of time and through recent debates on this matter.</text>
        <page num="2504" />
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000532">First, bushfires at their worst constitute an absolute disaster not just economically and socially but also environmentally, which means that many of the debates about the protection of native vegetation become more complicated. If we do face very severe bushfires, they can create greater environmental threat and destruction than the measures taken to control them. It is not such a black-and-white battle, as is often thought, between bushfire control and the protection of native vegetation.</text>
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000533">The second thing that has become very apparent to me is that this issue brings out very strong feelings and very strong opposing views. We have some people who are determined to defend native vegetation from controlled burning and so forth, and then we have people who see it as an opportunity to get rid of what they consider to be stupid restrictions imposed by unknowing and distant bureaucrats.</text>
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000534">I think the advantage of referring this to the Natural Resources Committee is that we could have quite a dispassionate, objective look at the matter removed from this battleground by a committee that has a record of hard work and the production of good reports. I think that it is well worthwhile, and it would be good to get on with it and have some sort of recommendations well before the next bushfire season.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2009-06-03T17:44:00" />
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000535">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-03T17:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER (17:44):</by>   I thank the Hon. Mr Winderlich for his contribution. Given that there has been no other contribution to this motion, I take it that it is agreed to by all in the council. I thank everyone for their support.</text>
        <text id="200906032ac297c1e4c843faa0000536">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>