Legislative Council Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3) 51 3 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Question Time Stony Hill Vineyard STONY HILL VINEYARD The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH Legislative Council STONY HILL VINEYARD The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH (14:57): I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for State/Local Government Relations, representing the Minister for Environment and Conservation, questions about the impending bulldozing of South Australia's oldest commercial vineyard, Stony Hill at Old Reynella. Leave granted. The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH Legislative Council The Hon. DAVID WINDERLICH: The Sunday Mail of 31 May reported that Stony Hill at Old Reynella is set to be bulldozed to enable the construction of just 41 homes. Stony Hill was established in 1839 by John Reynell and was planted with 32 hectares of cabernet sauvignon vines. Only two hectares of this vineyard remain. According to Onkaparinga council, the vineyard was removed from the state heritage list by the Department for Environment and Heritage. This is a very strange decision, because the vineyard clearly meets at least three of the seven criteria for listing under the state's Heritage Places Act: it demonstrates important aspects of the evolution or pattern of the state's history; it is an outstanding representative of a particular class of places of cultural significance; and it has a special association with the life or work of a person or organisation or an event of historical importance. To delist such an important part of our history for such a small gain, 41 homes—we are not talking about this vineyard blocking the development of Roxby, for example—raises the concern that nothing is safe. It also raises questions about the integrity of the heritage listing process. My questions are: 1.	Why was the Stony Hill vineyard taken off the state heritage register? 2.	Was the minister aware that the Department for Environment and Heritage had removed Stony Hill from the state heritage register? 3.	If the minister was not aware, will he undertake an investigation as to why the Department for Environment and Heritage made this bizarre decision? 4.	Will the minister step in and prevent the bulldozing of the Stony Hill vineyard until he has completed an investigation as to the reason for its removal from the state heritage register? The Hon. G.E. GAGO Legislative Council Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:59): I thank the honourable member for his important questions. I will refer them to the Minister for Environment and Conservation in another place and bring back a response.