<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2399" />
  <endPage num="2466" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Chelsea Cinema</name>
      <text id="2009060240c5b3559b0a4821b0000097">
        <heading>CHELSEA CINEMA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-02">
            <name>CHELSEA CINEMA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-02T14:36:00" />
        <text id="2009060240c5b3559b0a4821b0000098">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-02T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:36): </by> I have a supplementary question. Do I take it from what the minister has outlined in her answer that she holds concerns that the council decided to sell the site prior to public consultation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-02">
            <name>CHELSEA CINEMA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-02T14:36:00" />
        <text id="2009060240c5b3559b0a4821b0000099">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-02T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:36): </by> The advice I have received is that there was some level of community consultation. As I said, I have asked for details. I have asked officers certainly to inquire into the details of the processes that the council has undertaken. I do not have that information as yet, but my belief is that some level of consultation took place. Whether or not that was adequate, at this point in time I am not in a position to say. Clearly, if you read the public response to the proposed sale, it would appear that it could have perhaps been more extensive than what it was.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>