<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-05-13T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2271" />
  <endPage num="2340" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:56:47+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Buckland Park</name>
      <text id="20090513dfb59e59f8314e2b80000134">
        <heading>BUCKLAND PARK</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-05-13">
            <name>BUCKLAND PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-05-13T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20090513dfb59e59f8314e2b80000135">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-13T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:03):</by>  I have a further supplementary question. How does the Buckland Park development fit in with the government's commitment to transit-oriented development when the first bus will not go in until 2022 and, at the completion of the project, with 33,000 people, fewer than 5 per cent of trips will be by public transport, according to the proponents' own EIS?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-05-13">
            <name>BUCKLAND PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-05-13T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20090513dfb59e59f8314e2b80000136">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-13T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:03):</by>  The honourable member has at least read the EIS and I look forward to his submission, because they are exactly the issues that need to be considered as part of the EIS. I am pleased that, with his supplementary question, the honourable member is talking about information from the EIS rather than criticising it as being a ghetto, as well as the other criticisms he mentioned. They are exactly the issues that should be considered as part of the process. That is the sort of debate we should be having—not one-off slogans.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>