<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-05-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2225" />
  <endPage num="2272" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Seaford Rail Service</name>
      <text id="20090512a53ad6b7d2744e6a90000052">
        <heading>SEAFORD RAIL SERVICE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-24" qonNum="159">
            <name>SEAFORD RAIL SERVICE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090512a53ad6b7d2744e6a90000053">159 <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</by> (24 September 2008).  Can the Minister for Transport advise, in considering a resumption of passenger rail to Seaford, what cost savings are anticipated if the old Onkaparinga River bridge could be reused instead of building a new bridge over the river?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-24" qonNum="159">
            <name>SEAFORD RAIL SERVICE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090512a53ad6b7d2744e6a90000054">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy):</by>  The Minister for Transport has advised that:</text>
        <text id="20090512a53ad6b7d2744e6a90000055">Previous studies on the costs and feasibility of three rail alignments from Noarlunga to Seaford concluded that the cost of an alignment that uses the old Willunga Corridor and the old Noarlunga Rail Bridge would be approximately 14 per cent more expensive than the more direct route over the Onkaparinga Valley.</text>
        <text id="20090512a53ad6b7d2744e6a90000056">The increased length of the rail track, increased earth works associated with a new alignment, plus the additional cost of strengthening the old Noarlunga Rail Bridge to bring it up to today's standards would be significantly more than the cost of building a new bridge on the proposed alignment across the Onkaparinga River.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>