<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-04-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1879" />
  <endPage num="1971" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Liquor Licensing</name>
      <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000414">
        <heading>LIQUOR LICENSING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-04-08">
            <name>LIQUOR LICENSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-04-08T14:47:00" />
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000415">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-08T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (14:47):</by>  I seek leave to make an amazingly brief explanation before asking the Minister for Consumer Affairs a question about police barring.</text>
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000416">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000417">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by> On 1 March, new laws that enabled police to bar a person from licensed premises came into effect. Will the minister advise how effective this legislation has been to date?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-04-08T14:47:00" />
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000418">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-08T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:47):</by>  I thank the member for his very brief, but nonetheless important, question. Recently, I advised the council that these new laws under the Liquor Licensing Act 1997 had assisted police in the first 24 hours of operation allowing them to bar problem patrons from licensed venues. Since these laws have been in effect, police have issued 47 barring orders in the first month of changes to the law.</text>
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000419">I welcome the police efforts in cleaning up crime and disorderly conduct in and around pubs and clubs. As members would be aware, these laws allow police to have the power to bar people from licensed venues in a particular area or from all venues of a particular type for a specific period of time. This can be for reasons based on criminal intelligence or the welfare of the person or their family being seriously at risk. It also includes offences or offensive disorderly behaviour in or around licensed premises.</text>
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000420">Significantly, more than half the barring orders have been made in regional areas. In 24 instances, people have been barred for up to 72 hours and, on another 23 occasions, people have been barred for up to three months.</text>
        <page num="1906" />
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000421">The swift action by our police to stamp out unsavoury behaviour shows that laws are already proving to be very effective. South Australians can be increasingly confident of sharing a good night out without having to run the gauntlet of angry, aggressive and loud-mouthed behaviour. Unfortunately, all of us have probably had the experience of having our night ruined by some offensive bad behaviour.</text>
        <text id="20090408fed310e4070642e390000422">These laws also mean licensees do not always have to wear the potential backlash associated with clearing out troublemakers, as in the past they have had the power to bar from their premises but have always been reluctant to use those powers for fear of retribution. This appears to be working very well. There have been 24 orders issued on the grounds of offensive and disorderly behaviour, and people breaching a barring order can incur a fine of $1,250.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>