<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-03-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1775" />
  <endPage num="1817" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000291">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australia Police</name>
      <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000292">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-26">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-26T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000293">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-26T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:21): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Police a question about the new police headquarters.</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000294">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000295">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY: </by> In the last budget it was announced that money had been put aside for a new police headquarters, and today the government announced that the site at 100 Angus Street was a $100 million project and that it would spend $38 million to fit out the building. Upon becoming shadow minister for police I contacted a range of stakeholders to talk about the issues that I might confront. In fact, I spoke to a former police minister, who suggested that it was a long-term agenda of SAPOL to have a new building, and that it had been resisted while he was minister.</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000296">Today, the government indicated that one of the reasons it is building a new police station is that it has outgrown the existing premises. It is interesting to note that, while I have been learning from operational police, one operational officer in an LSA with significant crime issues said, 'Give me $38 million and I will clean up the suburbs in no time.' My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000297">1.&amp;#x9;When will frontline police officers be given tasers, and not just as part of a trial?</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000298">2.&amp;#x9;When will frontline officers be given proper equipment? Members opposite often laugh when I talk about suitable operational uniforms, raincoats and kitbags—some simple pieces of equipment.</text>
        <page num="1792" />
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000299">3.&amp;#x9;When will frontline officers get the resources to do the job properly?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-03-26T14:23:00" />
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000300">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-26T14:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:23): </by> This is like a cracked record. The South Australian police force under the Rann government has been better resourced than at any time in its history, including the number of police officers—the most important increase of all. There has been a massive increase in the police budget. It is the one budget that has not been cut in any way since this government came to office to ensure that police have adequate resources.</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000301">Not only that, we have gone a lot further in terms of giving police the legislation that is necessary to clean up crime. The one thing they have not had is a decent headquarters. To go back to the preamble of the honourable member's question, the implication is that senior police should not be moving into proper new police headquarters but staying where they are, in spite of the fact that the building is some 40 years old or thereabouts and has long since passed its prime in terms of accommodation.</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000302">The opposition may believe that the South Australian police force's commissioner, his executive and those who work in the head office are not entitled to the best possible accommodation, but this government disagrees. That is why we are supplying not only the massive resources for police but also we bought them new boats and a new aircraft. They had second-hand boats before, and we bought new boats and new aircraft—a whole lot of resources for the police force in this state. We have given them the best legislation in the country and increased their numbers by literally hundreds of extra police officers.</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000303">Not only have we delivered that but we also believe that the senior police, the executive, should have a new office. Many other government departments, over the past 15 or 20 years, have moved into new offices. Why is it that the opposition believe that the police are not entitled to have a new office? Why should they have to be housed in a building that is now no longer adequate? I believe, and this government believes, that our police are entitled not only to the resources that they are getting—for example, at present new firearms are being introduced into the police force, along with other—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000304">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  What about tasers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000305">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Well, the tasers: the honourable member well knows—</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000306">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000307">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Yes; of course they should be trialled. You would just go and give it to them. Do you really think that is a sensible idea? How dopey are members opposite? They say, 'You don't bother about training; someone somewhere else in the world has this new bit of equipment, so just hand it out willy-nilly. Just go and get buckets of them and hand them out to the police force without proper training or guidelines.'</text>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000308">Tasers can be a useful adjunct to police operations but they also need to be used properly or they can be quite dangerous. This government will take the advice of the police commissioner, who is the expert in relation to what equipment and what facilities his police officers need. I find it absolutely extraordinary that the opposition should be effectively, through this question, criticising the government for providing new police headquarters in this state.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000309">
          <by role="member" id="1704">An honourable member:</by>  Funny priorities.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090326e639998fb61d481080000310">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Funny priorities, they are saying—not giving the police new headquarters. It is extraordinary. What about all the new police stations we have provided? What about Berri, Mount Barker, Victor Harbor, Port Lincoln? They are all brand new police stations built under this government. There are some old police stations, but this government has provided these new stations through the PPP program, including a new police station at Aldinga, all in the past seven years. There have been massive increases in resources and yet, it spite of that, this opposition wants to deny the police new headquarters in this state. This government believes that the police, right down to the police on the beat, deserve the best, and we will do that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>