<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-03-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1693" />
  <endPage num="1775" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Uniforms</name>
      <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000131">
        <heading>POLICE UNIFORMS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-25">
            <name>POLICE UNIFORMS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-25T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000132">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-25T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (15:00):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government, representing the Minister for Police, a question about frontline police uniforms.</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000133">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1702" />
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000134">
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS:</by>  In last month's issue of the <term>Police Journal</term> several members of the police force were asked to provide their opinion on the current front-line uniform. It was described as impractical, uncomfortable and not user-friendly, amongst other things. The shadow minister for police, the Hon. David Ridgway, and myself have had precisely the same feedback from police officers we have talked to about this issue over a long period.</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000135">The consistent message is that the current uniform is acceptable for ceremonial occasions or for those doing desk jobs but is totally impractical for today's front-line police work, where lightweight cargo-style pants and shirts would be far more efficient. This sort of apparel, which is being used in other jurisdictions along with baseball-style caps and polar fleece jackets, seems the best and most practical way to go in modern policing. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000136">1.&amp;#x9;Has the minister discussed this important issue with the police commissioner?</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000137">2.&amp;#x9;Can the minister advise whether the groundswell of support from our police for new front-line uniforms will be heeded?</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000138">Given that until recently the leader was the police minister, he may wish to comment himself.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-03-25T15:02:00" />
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000139">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-25T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:02):</by>  I will certainly make one comment, and that is that the Hon. Mr Stephens seems to have a preoccupation with what our police wear and carry. This government's concern has been to protect the safety of our police force, and we believe in safety in numbers. That is why the size of the police force has grown from 3,400 in the mid 1990s to well over 4,000 at present.</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000140">This government believes that the best way it can guarantee the safety of our wonderful police force is by increasing the numbers of police; however, I am happy to refer the question to the minister in another place and obtain information regarding what is happening with uniforms. Clearly, from time to time it does make sense to change police uniforms consistent with current—</text>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000141">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000142">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  That is right; think of all the things—new weapons, including the tasers that we are trialling. What is more, there are new laws. Above all else, we have given police the laws they need. Look at DNA. South Australia leads the country in relation to that, and in relation to bikie legislation and the like. I think we have given police—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. Finnigan</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000143">
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. Finnigan:</by>  Malcolm Turnbull says that they should have our bikie legislation; he's all for it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090325746f8e98284841f3a0000144">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Indeed, he does. In law and order, as in so many things, South Australia is setting the pace.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>