<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1583" />
  <endPage num="1693" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Families SA</name>
      <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000203">
        <heading>FAMILIES SA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-24">
            <name>FAMILIES SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T15:21:00" />
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000204">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T15:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:21): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Families and Communities a question about Family Court intervention requests.</text>
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000205">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000206">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD: </by> Pursuant to sections 91B and 92A of the Family Law Act, judges and magistrates can request state child welfare agencies to urgently intervene in child custody and access proceedings if they have a fear that a child has 'been abused or is at risk of being abused'. These sorts of requests are usually made of Families SA when there are grave fears by a judge for a child's welfare and safety. Judges and federal magistrates who deal with children's matters are experts in child welfare and it would therefore be expected that requests made by these judicial officers to Families SA to intervene in such proceedings to ensure a child's welfare are responded to quickly and effectively.</text>
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000207">However, a recent reply to a question on notice of mine indicated that, of approximately 30 such requests received by Families SA in 2007 from the family and federal magistrates courts to urgently intervene to ensure a child's welfare, they intervened only twice. The government refused to supply data for 2008 and beyond, saying that it received 26 requests for intervention from 1 January to 30 September. The Minister for Families and Communities said that the department prepared 26 written responses for the Family Court but refused to say how many times it actually intervened. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000208">1.&amp;#x9;Did Families SA fail to intervene at all in 2008?</text>
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000209">2.&amp;#x9;Why, when a federal law judicial officer has requested Families SA intervention for a child's welfare, does Families SA so regularly fail to intervene?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T15:23:00" />
        <text id="2009032478df9951426a42d380000210">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T15:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:23): </by> I thank the honourable member for his important questions and will refer them to the Minister for Families and Communities in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>