<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1363" />
  <endPage num="1428" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000260">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Schools, Truancy</name>
      <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000261">
        <heading>SCHOOLS, TRUANCY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-19">
            <name>SCHOOLS, TRUANCY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000262">In reply to <by role="member" id="3128">the Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</by> (5 March 2008).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-19">
            <name>SCHOOLS, TRUANCY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000263">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy):</by>  The Minister for Education has provided the following information:</text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000264">During the last five years there have been seven occasions when parents have been considered for prosecution.</text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000265">Once the preliminary decision to prosecute is made by the Department of Education and Children's Services, the matter is then considered by the Crown Solicitor's Office. Of the seven matters referred to the Crown in the last five years, one has proceeded to a court appearance. During those proceedings, the parents agreed to co-operate with an alternative process and the matter was withdrawn from the court.</text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000266">The prosecution of parents is a final option and only in circumstances where the school's, DECS and other agencies' attempts to work with students and their parents/carers have failed.</text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000267">Some of the avenues which are widely used by schools to re-engage students include:</text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000268">
          <item sublevel="2">Attendance officers across the state who work with chronic non-attenders and their families.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000269">
          <item sublevel="2">A new electronic data system, Indigenous Student Support System, which provides staff in each of the state's 18 district offices with a daily picture of attendance patterns. District staff, including Aboriginal education workers and attendance officers, are alerted when students repeatedly miss school, allowing immediate follow-up action to take place.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20090219d09deb4f2e2343e5a0000270">The school and district are the most effective means to re-engage with truants and their families to ensure attendance. Consequently, very few interventions subsequently require reporting to the department for consideration for prosecution as provided for by the Education Act 1972.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>