<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1363" />
  <endPage num="1428" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Staff</name>
      <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000162">
        <heading>MINISTERIAL STAFF</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-19">
            <name>MINISTERIAL STAFF</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-19T14:48:00" />
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000163">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-19T14:48:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:48): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Premier a question about ministerial staff salaries.</text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000164">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000165">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Members will be aware that ministers in this government have almost 300 staff in their ministerial offices, many of whom are media advisers, spin doctors or staff employed under ministerial contract. According to the last public announcements, some of the salaries paid to these officers are as high, for example, as $165,000 for Mr Nick Alexandrides (who works for the Premier) and $147,000 for Ms Jillian Bottrall; and I think they were in the <term>Government Gazette</term> in July last year.</text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000166">Information provided to the Liberal Party is that, just prior to Christmas, the Premier and the government made a decision to give all their media advisers, spin doctors and other ministerial advisers on contract a pay rise of 3.5 per cent, which was backdated to July last year. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000167">1.&amp;#x9;Why did the Premier keep secret his government's decision made just prior to Christmas to give these staff a 3.5 per cent pay rise and to backdate it to 1 July last year?</text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000168">2.&amp;#x9;What was the exact date of the decision taken by the Premier and his government?</text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000169">3.&amp;#x9;When did these staff get their last pay increase prior to that, what was the level of that increase and was that increase also backdated?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-02-19T14:50:00" />
        <page num="1372" />
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000170">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-19T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:50): </by> My understanding is that the previous increase the staff had would have been on the previous 1 July. It is my understanding that a 3.5 per cent increase was also given to senior public servants, and ministerial staff were given it at the same time. </text>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000171">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20090219b0fca284eabd4895a0000172">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> There is nothing secret about it. What is secret about it? I do not think there is anything particularly secret about it. Presumably, the flow-on would have gone to electoral and opposition staff; that is usually the way, and I have no problem with that. I would have thought a 3.5 per cent increase was relatively modest at a time when many others in the community such as medical practitioners—some of the medical staff in the Public Service—received a little bit more than that. I do not think there is anything mysterious about it, but I will refer the question to the Premier. In case there is anything I have not covered, I will give him the opportunity to respond, but I do not think there is anything particularly unusual or unique about that increase.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>