<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-18T00:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1281" />
  <endPage num="1364" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:56:33+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000244">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Domiciliary Care</name>
      <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000245">
        <heading>DOMICILIARY CARE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-18">
            <name>DOMICILIARY CARE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000246">In reply to <by role="member" id="605">the Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (8 May 2008).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Gambling</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-18">
            <name>DOMICILIARY CARE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000247">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs):</by>  The Minister for Ageing has provided the following information:</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000248">Changes to the domiciliary care schedule of fees were made by Domiciliary Care SA as part of an internal review of the fees system that was introduced in 2000. Extensive consultation was conducted with Domiciliary Care SA's Consumer Advisory Committee, consumer reference groups and a telephone survey. This was undertaken to gauge the potential impact of the proposed changes. Those clients consulted were accepting of the proposed changes. The changes will provide a more equitable fees system for clients and will also result in a reduction in administrative processes.</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000249">Prior to this review, clients who did not have private health insurance may not have been eligible for an 'expenditure waiver' and other clients that could afford to pay for private health insurance would have been eligible for an 'expenditure waiver'. This was viewed as inequitable and has now been changed. Private health insurance is no longer included in the list of items that can be claimed for an 'expenditure waiver'.</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000250">The removal of private health insurance as a claimable expense at the time affected 1,760 existing clients. These clients have been encouraged to reapply for a waiver of fees under the new criteria.</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000251">1,540 clients had been issued with waiver renewal forms up to 28 November 2008. 903 clients (60 per cent) had been approved with a financial ongoing waiver. 484 clients (30 per cent) had either not reapplied or were not approved a waiver. Each of these clients were contacted on an individual basis and outcomes included returning of equipment not being used, satisfaction with paying for services, taking up the direct debit option with Centrelink or purchasing their own equipment.</text>
        <page num="1297" />
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000252">Service coordinators of the clients not qualifying for a waiver were informed in every case and, if circumstances were appropriate, a high risk waiver was approved. Thirteen high risk waivers have been approved (&gt;1 per cent of total clients). 132 client files were closed, the clients either having passed away or having been placed in residential care (8 per cent). Thirteen clients are still being assisted with reapplying for a waiver, i.e., home visits.</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000253">89 waiver renewals were posted in early November for waivers expiring in December 2008 and January 2009. 30 clients have waivers expiring between February and May 2009—after this time all clients affected by the changes will have been reassessed.</text>
        <text id="20090218950151e59070448c90000254">An estimated increase in client contribution of $105,000 per annum is forecast.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>