<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1197" />
  <endPage num="1232" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cheltenham Park</name>
      <text id="20090205e2ac15adacc34fcdb0000076">
        <heading>CHELTENHAM PARK</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:40:00" />
        <page num="1202" />
        <text id="20090205e2ac15adacc34fcdb0000077">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:40): </by> I have a supplementary question. Can the minister inform the council of the maximum height of the buildings within the development plan and the expected number of people who will live on the site?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:40:00" />
        <text id="20090205e2ac15adacc34fcdb0000078">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:40): </by> A development plan amendment actually sets the guidelines for what can be built. It talks about densities but, of course, ultimately the design will be that put forward by the developers. Yes, it must conform to the development plan and, if the honourable member wants to read the specific details, he can obtain a copy of it. It has been out since August last year. How many houses are on there will ultimately depend. One can have maximum limits, but that does not mean one will necessarily exceed the maximum. But there is provision for medium densities, particularly near the transport corridors. Obviously, the number of people who will ultimately be on that site will depend on what is proposed.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>