<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1197" />
  <endPage num="1232" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000069">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Cheltenham Park</name>
      <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000070">
        <heading>CHELTENHAM PARK</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:38:00" />
        <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000071">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:38): </by> As a supplementary question, will the minister advise the council whether the wetland that will form these works is any larger than the wetland that has appeared in the concept plans for the past several months?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:38:00" />
        <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000072">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:38): </by> I have already answered that question. I said that at 1.2 gigalitres it is some six times larger than the 200 megalitres which I think were originally envisaged. When the honourable member gets the statement from minister Maywald which I have just tabled—</text>
        <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000073">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000074">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> No, I did not, but the statement from minister Maywald provides the size of some of the other waterproofing projects: Waterproofing Northern Adelaide substitutes 12.1 gigalitres per year, and there is the Lochiel Park Green Village; the Metropolitan Adelaide stormwater re-use project, which substitutes up to 1 gigalitre per year of water; and the Barker Inlet, etc. The government is also negotiating with Adelaide Airport.</text>
        <text id="200902054619c78f275942d8b0000075">This is six times larger than was originally envisaged, and the catchment area that will be served by this is now some 893 hectares, I believe, which is bigger than the 400 or so hectares for the Torrens Road catchment area.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>