<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2009-02-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1117" />
  <endPage num="1160" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
      <text id="20090203850f8a6f107b4737a0000400">
        <heading>ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-03">
            <name>ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-03T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20090203850f8a6f107b4737a0000401">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-03T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:41):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Is Mark Henley incorrect in saying that people are more likely to gamble in tough economic times?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-03">
            <name>ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-03T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20090203850f8a6f107b4737a0000402">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-03T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:41):</by>  I do not have the expertise to know why people do or do not gamble. As I have said, Mark Henley is a very respected person within the concern sector. He is part of the responsible gambling working party. As the honourable member has already received a briefing, I am sure she would know all the regulations and codes of practice that we have in place to ensure that we have a responsible gambling industry. We also have Club Safe and Gaming Care, and we have procedures and policies in place to ensure that, as much as possible, people gamble in a responsible manner.</text>
        <text id="20090203850f8a6f107b4737a0000403">I have also spoken in this place about the precommitment trial. As members would know, legislation will be introduced on the floor of this parliament to remove the $50,000 cap, which will stimulate the market and help to reduce the number of poker machines in this state. This government has undertaken endless initiatives, including education at the school level and research. One does not know where to stop and where to start. So, for members opposite to suggest that this government does not care about seeing responsible gambling in this state really is a nonsense.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>