<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-11-27T00:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="987" />
  <endPage num="1065" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:56:04+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000400">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Grocery Unit Pricing</name>
      <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000401">
        <heading>GROCERY UNIT PRICING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-27">
            <name>GROCERY UNIT PRICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-11-27T14:27:00" />
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000402">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-27T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:27): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Consumer Affairs a question about unit pricing.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000403">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000404">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  I note that the government in past responses to questions about unit pricing (in particular, from former member the Hon. Ian Gilfillan) did not support that measure. However, there are moves at the federal level and, in particular, on 5 August this year the federal government released an ACCC grocery inquiry and stated it would consider the implementation of unit pricing. I have also received information from Choice, which is the Australian Consumers' Association, to the effect that in one of its surveys unit pricing was supported by 89 per cent of its respondents. My questions are: has the government changed its mind on this matter, and does the government support the Queensland model, which has a range of approaches that are outlined in a draft fair trading amendment regulation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-11-27T14:28:00" />
        <page num="1011" />
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000405">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-27T14:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (14:28): </by> Obviously, the price of groceries is an issue that affects all of us, and the advent of websites such as GROCERYchoice is directly linked to the price pressures of today's globalised economy. These pressures explain why there is increasing momentum around the nation to bring in measures such as unit pricing to give consumers more value for money and to help them make smarter, more informed choices in a simple way.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000406">Obviously unit pricing gives consumers a better idea of how much value they are getting for their money by allowing easy price comparisons, because it provides a volumetric price on each product. That means that items are expressed not only in terms of their total price but also in terms of the amount per kilogram or litre, depending on the appropriate unit.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000407">This transparency in pricing helps consumers compare the cost of similar items in a supermarket without having to take their own calculator to do their own calculations. The uniform trade measurement legislation already requires unit pricing for goods such as fruit, vegetables, cheese, dressed poultry, meat, fish and smallgoods, unless packed in specified weights, rigid containers and so on. This has helped consumers compare the value of those food products. We are quite used to that method of pricing. There is a national push to go down the path of unit pricing.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000408">The ACCC recently released a report which inquired into the competitiveness of retail prices for standard grocery items. The ACCC recommended that a nationally consistent unit pricing scheme for standard grocery items be implemented. So, that recommendation has been made. In response to that report, the commonwealth government has indicated that it will finalise the design of a national pricing scheme by the end of the year, with the scheme becoming operative as soon as possible thereafter.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000409">Prior to the implementation of that scheme, the ACCC has recommended that a cost-benefit analysis be undertaken and, as such, the commonwealth government has released an issues paper calling for comment on the design elements of what a national system might look like. South Australia is supportive and remains supportive of the proposal to implement a national unit pricing scheme. South Australia will continue to work with the commonwealth government to ensure that the system provides an appropriate and adequate mechanism to inform consumers of the unit price of grocery items.</text>
        <text id="20081127948801d6aeeb41ff90000410">At this point I am not aware that any particular model is proposed to be adopted. I think that we need to wait to see the outcome of the work the commonwealth has put in place and be advised by that. Certainly, South Australia continues to be supportive of it and continues to participate in an attempt to move towards a nationally-consistent approach.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>