<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="849" />
  <endPage num="988" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000728">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Member's Remarks</name>
      <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000729">
        <heading>MEMBER'S REMARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-11-26T16:04:00" />
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000730">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-26T16:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (16:04):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000731">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000732">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I want to address the claims made in this place by the Hon. Rob Lucas both today and yesterday that I attended a lunch on 29 August that was sponsored by a company that may have been a tenderer for the desalination proposal.</text>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000733">I want it firmly placed on the record that I did not attend the lunch I was claimed to have attended. Not only did I not attend that lunch on 29 August but to the very best of my knowledge I have not attended any lunch with that particular tenderer or any other tenderer I am aware of for the desal project. Parliamentary privilege is indeed a wonderful thing, but you can see when it has been abused, as it has been by the Hon. Robert Lucas.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000734">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  On a point of order—</text>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000735">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="25">The Hon. P. Holloway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000736">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  You are the one who rants on about the standing orders of the council. The President has the call, surely.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000737">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! What is your point of order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000738">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  My point of order is that, in raising a point of order in relation to where she has been misled, the minister can only address where she has been misled.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. Gago</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="896" />
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000739">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. Gago:</by>  That is outrageous!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000740">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Obviously, the minister is defending what she says is an untrue statement.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000741">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Thank you for your protection, sir. As I said, I clearly want to put on the record that the Hon. Rob Lucas's claims were complete wrong and completely inaccurate. He is out of touch and has got it wrong yet again. What a loser!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000742">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS:</by>  On a point of order, Mr President, the minister is clearly debating the issue. Personal explanations are simply what they are said to be: personal explanations. They are not for debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000743">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The minister will have other opportunities to put more on the record if she so chooses.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000744">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Thank you, Mr President. I was distracted momentarily. As I have said, I want to make sure that the record is straight. I did not attend that lunch on 29 August. To the best of my knowledge, I have not attended any lunch with that particular sponsor or any other sponsor of the desal—</text>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000745">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="10">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200811269c5347b8a1bb430480000746">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  No; you should listen. I repeated exactly what I said earlier. They are deaf as well as dumb! Because of the incorrect claims made by the Hon. Rob Lucas, who has obviously got the wrong end of the stick, with information that is clearly inaccurate, I place on the record that he needs to get his facts right before he comes in here and shoots his mouth off. I have adhered to the probity guidelines in the past, and I continue to adhere to them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>