<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-11-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="555" />
  <endPage num="600" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000075">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Planning and Development Report</name>
      <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000076">
        <heading>PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-11">
            <name>PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-11-11T14:36:00" />
        <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000077">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-11T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:36):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Urban Development and Planning a question about the report provided to the minister by the Planning and Development Review Steering Committee.</text>
        <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000078">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000079">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  I refer to Appendix G of the report presented to the minister by the Planning and Development Review Steering Committee containing the quantification of the potential benefits of the planning reforms. I note that Appendix G contains statements about the costs of administering the current system and the estimated savings to local government of adopting the review team's recommended reforms.</text>
        <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000080">I recall that the estimates of savings were in the order of $75.6 million to applicants and local government, leading to an approximate increase of $3.5 billion to $5 billion in gross state product over the next five years. My questions are: can the minister confirm the quantum of the estimated savings and economic benefits documented in the report; and can the minister outline the methodology used by the review team in arriving at this level of savings and increases in gross state product?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-11-11T14:37:00" />
        <text id="20081111270b5b3f95734aa490000081">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-11T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (14:37):</by>  Those calculations were made by KPMG who, of course, were lead consultants to the review. As I have said on previous occasions, whatever methodology was used, even if the figure were half that, it would still be a very significant contribution to GSP. I have just given notice of the fact that I will introduce a bill in the council tomorrow, and part of that bill will define estimates of those particular savings to applicants, to local government and also to the economy at large. Obviously those figures were calculated by the methodology that KPMG employed.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>