<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="391" />
  <endPage num="438" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Copper Coast District Council</name>
      <text id="20081028fbfb6c55d4d84eb780000241">
        <heading>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-10-28">
            <name>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-10-28T15:18:00" />
        <page num="405" />
        <text id="20081028fbfb6c55d4d84eb780000242">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-28T15:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (15:18): </by> I have a supplementary question, Mr President. Given the briefings and material that the minister has had an opportunity already to consider, is the minister satisfied that the Copper Coast council has provided due process to all interested parties in relation to the planning application?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-10-28">
            <name>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-10-28T15:18:00" />
        <text id="20081028fbfb6c55d4d84eb780000243">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-28T15:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Energy) (15:18): </by> I have answered the question, if the honourable member had listened. It is a matter for the appropriate minister but, in terms of the preliminary information that I am seeking to obtain prior to making a decision about a formal investigation, as I have already stated, that process is still under way. It has been under way for some time. It has been quite comprehensive. As I have said, we have requested one round of information. That has been looked at and considered carefully. It was decided that further information was needed and, again, correspondence went out requesting that information. That information has come back and is currently with the Crown Solicitor's office.</text>
        <text id="20081028fbfb6c55d4d84eb780000244">It would be most inappropriate for me to say anything further about that until the Crown Solicitor's office has had an opportunity to consider it in full and provide me with whatever recommendations or advice it might have in respect of these matters. The process has been open, transparent and thorough. People's rights have to be upheld, as well, in terms of due process—and that is what is being undertaken at present.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>