<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="251" />
  <endPage num="290" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Prisons, Overcrowding</name>
      <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000167">
        <heading>PRISONS, OVERCROWDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-10-14">
            <name>PRISONS, OVERCROWDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-10-14T14:50:00" />
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000168">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-14T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:50): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Correctional Services a question about prison overcrowding.</text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000169">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000170">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  In the minister's ministerial statement she stated: </text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000171">
          <inserted>Having two prisoners to a cell is not a breach of human rights. It is not overcrowding.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="260" />
        <text continued="true" id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000172">The 2005 South Australian Labor state platform states that Labor 'will ensure that South Australian correctional facilities comply, as a minimum, with internationally agreed standards for the supervision and treatment of offenders'. The relevant key international standard is the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners 1955. Rule 9(1) of the Standard Minimum Rules states: </text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000173">
          <inserted>Where sleeping accommodation is in individual cells or rooms, each prisoner shall occupy by night a cell or room by himself. If for special reasons, such as temporary overcrowding, it became necessary for the central prison administration to make an exception to this rule, it is not desirable to have two prisoners in a cell or room. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000174">I remind the council that this is not an opposition commitment: it is a commitment of the Labor government in its platform less than three years ago. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000175">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister concede that the government is in breach of its own 2005 ALP platform?</text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000176">2.&amp;#x9;If two prisoners to a cell is not overcrowding, how many people does the minister think it is acceptable to keep in a cell designed for one occupant before she does consider that it is overcrowding?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-10-14T14:51:00" />
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000177">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-14T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:51): </by> I thank the honourable member for his question. Perhaps he should ask the community out there when they go to public hospitals whether they think two prisoners to a cell is overcrowding. Doubling up has been used not just by this government; it was actually commenced by that lot, the Liberal opposition, which commenced doubling up as a means of maintaining safety in our prisons and maintaining those numbers. For the honourable member to stand up and talk that kind of tosh is really nonsense.</text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000178">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000179">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000180">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO: </by> Indeed, as the Hon. Robert Lawson recently said to me, it is actually desirable for reasons of a buddy system to have two prisoners in a cell. In relation to anything else, I have been on the record on a number of occasions now saying that we have the old forensic science division in Yatala where we can put three prisoners to a cell. They are actually not cells: it is the old forensic science hospital; and, of course, always as an emergency we may have to do other things. Clearly, we will be using doubling up as a means of ensuring that we have a safe and secure system in this state, and I make no apologies for that.</text>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000181">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20081014e96d09d90d9f425180000182">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! Perhaps someone would like to visit the shearers' quarters out at the back of Bourke.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>