<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-09-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="225" />
  <endPage num="252" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Advertising</name>
      <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000223">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-25">
            <name>GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-25T15:08:00" />
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000224">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-25T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (15:08): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government, representing the Premier, a question about government advertising.</text>
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000225">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000226">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE: </by> On television screens across South Australia in recent months taxpayers have seen advertisements featuring the Premier lauding his government's efforts to establish a desalination plant and, thereby, save the River Murray. These advertisements include aerial footage of elements of the Murray that would have required the hiring of a plane or a helicopter to fly over those sites with an experienced photographer to take that professional footage. Estimates we have received have put the cost of this advertisement and the production at hundreds of thousands of dollars. On Thursday 11 September, a gentleman called Bill rang commercial radio in Adelaide and said of this advertisement:</text>
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000227">
          <inserted>Watching Kenny's toilet show on channel...it was all right except on the break. There's Mr Rann pops up with an ad about the desal plant and I thought to myself, this is a waste of money, we already know about it, what's going on?...well it's just a waste of money, we already know about it and I think the Western Australian election and the two by-elections we had recently in the last week, the message was loud and clear that the public aren't going to put up with this sort of nonsense of spin, they want action.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000228">I understand that the government ran print advertisements at a cost of $400,000 promoting its country health plan when it was struggling to get that plan accepted in country South Australia. I also recall that, before the last state election, there were a number of advertisements featuring the Premier outlining how the government was meeting South Australia's State Strategic Plan. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000229">1.&amp;#x9;Does he condone the spending of taxpayer money to promote the government's activities and achievements?</text>
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000230">2.&amp;#x9;How much did the desalination and River Murray advertisements cost, and how much money does the government have set aside for public advertising of the government's achievements from now until the state election?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-09-25T15:10:00" />
        <page num="239" />
        <text id="20080925cf7d34ba461346cfb0000231">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-25T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:10): </by> I do not know the cost of those things. I will take those questions on notice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>