<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="91" />
  <endPage num="137" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Le Cornu Site</name>
      <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000163">
        <heading>LE CORNU SITE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-23">
            <name>LE CORNU SITE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-23T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000164">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-23T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:03): </by> By way of supplementary question, having approved a six-storey development is it the minister's intention now to introduce a ministerial development plan amendment to raise the general height levels in that part of North Adelaide from three storeys to six storeys?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-23">
            <name>LE CORNU SITE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-23T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000165">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-23T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:03): </by> No, it is not, but we need to see through the whole of Adelaide a general raising of height. If we are to achieve the planning review's goals of its aspirational target of 70 per cent of new development coming from infill, brown fill high-rise development, as opposed to green fill development—and I hope members of the Greens accept that we need to move away from urban sprawl—we will have to have higher developments, but they need to be put in the right location.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000166">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas: </by> No-one is listening.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000167">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> I have been asked a question and I will answer it. Members opposite do not want to hear it—they never do. How else could you be in this place for 26 years and be sitting on the back bench? To achieve the density that we require, the best way of doing that is to have that more intensive development with transit oriented developments along major corridors. That is the way to achieve the population targets this government has set. The population will grow. We will need several hundred thousand more houses within the state, and to accommodate them we will need to put them in that extra density in more suitable locations. Generally they will be along corridors. This government has a cohesive policy. The rabble opposite do not, as they are knockers and whingers.</text>
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000168">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080923eb86c7f414b34050a0000169">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Why have members opposite come out and said that they support the Le Cornu development? What dishonest frauds they are! If the Hon. Rob Lucas believes it, why does he not get out and campaign? If he wants to get back at his leader in another place, why does he not say that if the Liberals were in government we would not have allowed this development to go ahead? They will not say that. They are far too dishonest for that. This government is quite happy to stand by the decision and to be judged on it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>