<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-09-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="43" />
  <endPage num="92" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Council Consolidation and Better Development Plan</name>
      <text id="20080911263b04096a2b459ba0000143">
        <heading>COUNCIL CONSOLIDATION AND BETTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-11">
            <name>COUNCIL CONSOLIDATION AND BETTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-11T15:08:00" />
        <text id="20080911263b04096a2b459ba0000144">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-11T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER (15:08):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Is the minister giving me an assurance that he is willing to have the ERD Committee look at part 1 of this as well as part 2?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-11">
            <name>COUNCIL CONSOLIDATION AND BETTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-11T15:09:00" />
        <text id="20080911263b04096a2b459ba0000145">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-11T15:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:09):</by>  Part 1, as I understood it, was there and I assumed that, if the committee wanted to have a look at it, it would have done so. I do not know whether or not the honourable member is suggesting that there was some reason why the committee could not look at part 1. Part 2, it appeared to me, was the more contentious part. However, if the ERD Committee wants to look at any particular zoning and make recommendations, I will consider it.</text>
        <text id="20080911263b04096a2b459ba0000146">We have a procedure in place but, given the fact that these are in remote areas of the state and it is a comprehensive area, if the ERD Committee wants to have a look at zoning in those areas I am always happy to listen to any advice that it can provide.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>