<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-09-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="43" />
  <endPage num="92" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sexual Behaviour Clinic</name>
      <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000081">
        <heading>SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR CLINIC</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-11">
            <name>SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR CLINIC</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-11T14:43:00" />
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000082">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-11T14:43:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:43): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Correctional Services a question about the Mullighan inquiry.</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000083">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000084">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE: </by> The Mullighan inquiry report recommended that the Sexual Behaviour Clinic of the Department for Correctional Services be expanded so that all child sex offenders can attend the program while in custody and at any stage of their sentence. To this point the intensive program has been available only at Port Augusta and Yatala. This is the only recommendation of the inquiry the government rejected. According to the government response to the inquiry tabled on 17 June, the government rejected the recommendation on the basis that it was not operationally feasible.</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000085">In early July the minister defended the government's decision in parliament. Again, on radio FIVEaa in August, the minister continued to justify delivering the program to some but not all prisoners. The opposition has been advised that the government is in the process of yet another backflip with plans to expand the program. Specifically, the government plans to introduce the intensive program to South Australia's regional prisons, including Mount Gambier. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000086">1.&amp;#x9;Will she confirm that the Sexual Behaviour Clinic programs will be expanded?</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000087">2.&amp;#x9;Will the expanded program fully implement recommendation 13 of the Mullighan inquiry?</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000088">3.&amp;#x9;What has changed since 17 June to make the recommendation operationally feasible?</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000089">4.&amp;#x9;Will she give an assurance to this council that the expanded program is fully funded from new money and that no other programs of the department are being wound back to fund the enhanced program?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Gambling</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-09-11T14:45:00" />
        <page num="48" />
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000090">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-11T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Gambling, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:45): </by> One cannot win with those opposite. We are putting in something extra to the community, and they are complaining. Isn't that just extraordinary? We are putting extra rehabilitation into our prisons, and they are complaining. I place on record again that it was this government that introduced the sex offenders rehabilitation program, a world renowned program. We used the Canadian model and had a budget when it was introduced over three or four years, and it is now part of our recurrent budget of about $1.5 million per year.</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000091">The program, as the honourable member would know, was first piloted at Yatala Labour Prison and in the community in 2005. Last year an additional prison-based program—a core program, as we call it—was run at Port Augusta prison, and an additional program will commence. It was going to be my good news story, but my advice is that we can commence one in October at the Mount Gambier prison. Why those opposite would not welcome the expansion of rehabilitation in our prisons is a complete mystery to everybody other than those opposite.</text>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000092">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809116ea9d4ebea4447de80000093">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO: </by> He says he will welcome it, so what is the issue? This extra rehabilitation in our prisons is a good thing, and I have no idea why those opposite would not welcome it. The program will expand as it is possible to do so, and that is exactly what we are doing.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>