Legislative Council Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3) 51 3 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Question Time Marathon Resources MARATHON RESOURCES The Hon. M. PARNELL Legislative Council MARATHON RESOURCES The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:59): I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Mineral Resources Development a question about Marathon Resources. Leave granted. The Hon. M. PARNELL Legislative Council The Hon. M. PARNELL: Last week I had the privilege of visiting the Arkaroola wilderness sanctuary and seeing at first hand this extraordinarily wild and beautiful part of South Australia. I was also able to visit the sites of damage and destruction caused by Marathon Resources. On 26 February this year I asked the minister to confirm once and for all whether, when the clean-up by the company was complete, the government would cancel Marathon's exploration licence. The minister replied: The investigation in relation to the Marathon company is still ongoing, and until that is completed I am not prepared to make any final statement. This government certainly has no intention of allowing Marathon Resources to resume activities in the foreseeable future, however, any final decision will obviously have to wait until all investigations are complete. The investigations are now complete, and I have here a copy of the final report, which was jointly prepared by PIRSA and the EPA, and I obtained this report under freedom of information. The report outlines, in some considerable detail, all of the breaches of Marathon's exploration licence conditions as well as breaches of accompanying PIRSA authorisations. Also, according to the final investigation report, on 19 December 2007, Marathon requested the use of two new drill rigs in the sanctuary at Mount Gee so it could fast track its drilling program. In late December (one or two weeks later), PIRSA received the allegations of the inappropriate disposal of waste in pits at Mount Gee from the Leigh Creek police. The new drill rig request was granted by PIRSA on 10 January 2008, in spite of these outstanding allegations and in spite of the fact that its own team of three, and an EPA team of two inspectors, were due to travel to Arkaroola only five days later on 15 January 2008. My questions are: 1.	Why, given the seriousness of the allegations, was the company granted an opportunity to actually accelerate its drilling program whilst those allegations were unresolved? 2.	I refer to the unique fluorite occurrence which was damaged and removed by Marathon employees. I did inspect that site and the remaining fluorite is, in fact, incredibly beautiful. I also understand that it is very rare and very valuable. Where is the fluorite now that was taken, and what actions has PIRSA taken to find that fluorite and to return it to the Arkaroola sanctuary? 3.	Will the minister once and for all confirm that, when the clean up by the company is complete, the government will finally cancel Marathon's exploration licence? The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY Legislative Council Minister for Mineral Resources Development Minister for Urban Development and Planning Minister for Small Business The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (16:02): In relation to the fluorite occurrence, that is referred to in the investigation. If the honourable member has a copy of the report, as he said, I would suggest that he read the detail there. As I understand it, and it is some time since I have read the report, there was obviously some dispute over who had taken this particular fluorite. Clearly, the expectation would be that it was someone within the company, but who exactly had done it and what had happened to it, of course, was somewhat indeterminate. It would be very difficult to track down exactly what had happened in relation to that, because there are also other people on the Arkaroola site who— An honourable member interjecting: The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY Legislative Council The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: Well, it may have been disturbed, but who actually took it is, of course, another matter. However, I believe that that matter is adequately covered in the report that the honourable member says he has in his possession. In relation to the future of drilling at Mount Gee, I have already answered that in an earlier question today, in that the exploration licence remains live until the exploration is finished. As to the future of it, that is something that will have to await until the clean up is finished. When I made my statement I think I mentioned a number of other conditions that Marathon Resources will have to meet before any further exploration will be permitted in that area. One of the obvious ones is its relationship with the landholders. The view I have expressed to any mineral explorer is that, if they do not have good relations with the landholders, the future of mining within those areas is likely to be bleak.