<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-09-10T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="45" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:55:49+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Wind Farms</name>
      <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000528">
        <heading>WIND FARMS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-10">
            <name>WIND FARMS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-10T15:37:00" />
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000529">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-10T15:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (15:37):</by>  Given the statement I made in my question and the minister's answer, will the minister now require TrustPower to start again with respect to all aspects of the approval process?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000530">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I think the minister has answered that question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-09-10T15:37:00" />
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000531">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-10T15:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:37):</by>  That is clearly an option but, obviously, I will wait for advice from the department concerning exactly what is proposed because, as I understand it, there have been at least some changes in what has been put to me relative to what has been reported in the newspapers.</text>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000532">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000533">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Well, yes, but if there was less—if one was moving from 20 to 16 and was not making it any closer—I would not have thought that that, of itself, would be something that would increase environmental concerns. However, I also understand that—</text>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000534">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000535">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  I think the honourable member should stop throwing names around.</text>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000536">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000537">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! The Hon. Mr Ridgway is out of order. Any names he throws around will not be recorded unless the minister responds to interjections.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000538">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  It is not helpful—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000539">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  It's in the newspaper.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200809107ccf85c84e594358a0000540">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Well, just because something is in the newspaper does not make it correct. The Hon. Mr Brokenshire has asked a serious question about that matter. He has asked me whether I will be considering one of those options, that is, to make them apply again. That is clearly one of the options I will be considering.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>