<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3659" />
  <endPage num="3712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Rehabilitation Providers</name>
      <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000419">
        <heading>WORKCOVER REHABILITATION PROVIDERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-24">
            <name>WORKCOVER REHABILITATION PROVIDERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-07-24T15:15:00" />
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000420">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-24T15:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (15:15):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Mineral Resources Development, representing the Minister for Industrial Relations, a question in relation to WorkCover rehabilitation providers.</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000421">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="3690" />
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000422">
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  On 16 July 2000, the <term>Advertiser</term> published an article regarding Ms Sandra De Poi, and allegations of a conflict of interest. Ms De Poi, a member of the WorkCover Board, is also the managing director of De Poi Consultancy Services, which is an Adelaide-based workplace injury management and occupational rehabilitation provider.</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000423">The article states that De Poi Consultancy Services has received over $6.2 million in contracts from WorkCover referrals since the 2004-05 financial year. Last financial year, all rehabilitation providers were allocated work on a rotational basis. I am advised that case managers were able to override this process at their discretion and allocate work to any rehabilitation provider. I am further advised that De Poi Consultancy Services was exempt from this rotational referral process.</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000424">This financial year, work has been allocated to rehabilitation providers, based on their performance which is determined by the CAPO system. This system uses certain variables such as cost and return-to-work statistics to establish the performance of each registered rehabilitation provider against other registered rehabilitation providers. I am advised that the only rehabilitation providers who are excluded from this referral process are those smaller rehabilitation providers who did not receive enough referrals in the past to have a large enough sample size. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000425">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister confirm whether De Poi Consultancy Services was exempt from the rotational referral system used in previous years?</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000426">2.&amp;#x9;If so, can the minister provide an explanation as to why this was the case?</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000427">3.&amp;#x9;Are De Poi Consultancy Services current referrals from WorkCover based on the CAPO system?</text>
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000428">4.&amp;#x9;Does De Poi Consultancy Services meet or exceed industry benchmarks standards in its return-to-work outcomes?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-07-24T15:17:00" />
        <text id="200807247ff0a8f48b0447b5b0000429">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-24T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Small Business) (15:17):</by>  I will refer that question to my colleague in another place and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>